1440p vs 4k ps5 reddit HDR is the real difference not 4K. Because most of its games are running closer to that resolution than 4K. Either by dynamically lowering FPS to get 4k, or dynamically lowering resolution to maintain higher FPS. It's easier to find better HDR support, higher brightness, higher color accuracy, better ergonomics, etc if you go with a 4K monitor. 27in is the sweet spot for 1440p. Measure your distance to your screen. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. The difference is noticeable. 5 inch. 25x, looks better than DLDSR Quality at native resolution. 1440p vs 4k is really resolution vs framerate and what GPU you have I was hoping that games like Resident Evil R3make 2 PS5 version with bad frame rate in 4k raytracing mode would run better in 1440p resolution. The feature added to PS5 to output to 1440P is purely the video it puts out NOT the render resolution of the game. I haven't moved for 4k gaming because I prefer the refresh rate but the people claiming the difference is minimal are blind or just assuaging their budgets with bullshit. 1440P vs 4K . The 4k one will be better looking. Good news is PC parts are more expensive than ever and I should be able to sell it all for a profit. There are other things that are more standard on 4K monitors though just because they're more expensive. If you go 4k, go 32 inch at minimum. 1440p is a great middle ground between 1080p and 4K. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. Basically zero games run at actual 4k on the ps5 anyway. Secondly, is 4K worth it for a monitor or would it be bettter to save the money and just get a 1440p monitor instead? The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. You don't need HDMI 2. Since 1440p support on console is a scaler function only, games will still render at the developer target, using FSR 2. You'll need that monitor to have an HDMI 2. If you can afford ~$400, I'd say get the best of both worlds and get one of the 28" 4k 144Hz monitors like the Gigabyte M28U, Acer Nitro XV282K KVbmipruzx and Samsung On 4K, I get around 50-60 fps depending on which game I play and a little tweaking to my settings. While a ps5 can do 1440p you loose out on VRR and there most often the I don't think any game can run 120fps, possibly a Ps5 pro will have that power and i've seen some videos showing that the 4k may have ghosting effect, if you choose a higher hz say 120hz you may notice interpolation, stuttering juddering and screen tearing even on movies so personally i'd stick with a 4K 60fps TV with a good hdmi 2. I'm not sure what is the better option, I don't think many ps5 games run more than 60fps at the moment so I tend to think the 4k option would be better but I am not 100% sure. Setting the ps5 to 1440p will have the TV do it which isn't the best idea as the pixel count for 1440p doesn't perfectly upscale to 4k which leads to a Brothers, I am struggling and can’t decide whether to go with the ultrawide or the 4k. Sounds like you want the experience akin to a PC, so I’d recommend the 1440p. I have both a 27in and 32in 1440p, and 1440p definitely looks better in smaller size, the dpi difference is noticeable. 0 should suit you just fine. I feel I need a decent amount of AA though to smooth things out as much as possible because upscaling alone makes things blocky. 0 is good enough at 4K. That being said, I can confirm the benq ex2780q 27inch 144hz display at 1440p can accept a 4K signal and scale it to 1440 on the actual Well it's about clarity of the image. May PC gamers go for 2K (1440p). The 1440-1800p is the internal render resolution which is then upscaled to 4k and sent to your screen. MGSV is one of my favourite games of all time and was wondering if since the game is running the ps4pro version which runs natively at 1440p, would it look better Also, even the most powerful GPUs struggle to get a consistent frame rate with 4k. Remder resolution is seperate from the display resolution. But from 1440p to 4k I felt it was a massive difference. Not amazing, but not terrible, either. It depends If the PS5 does use the 1440p resolution or not. Discussion It supports Dolby Vision, native 4K and also supports ultrawide mode and can be used with my ps5 and Apple TV 4K in addition to my Gaming PC. According to Digital Foundry, PS4 pro games that support 4K do look better on PS5 in 1080p than on PS4Pro. Reply reply More replies Something to consider is that for the super intense RT graphics stuff, a 4070ti @ 1440p is faster than a 4090 @ 4k - even if you have the deepest pockets you lose some performance going 4k. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. For example, even if the display resolution is 4k, the developer can change the internal render resolution to 1080p. I have a 40" 4K monitor and 1440p doesn't look too bad. In fact, right now, I have both a 1080p and 1440p screen both exactly 22 inches from my face. If playing on a 1080p or 1440p screen, or if for some other reason you have your PS5 set to output in 1080p or 1440p, then use “Performance Sharp”. In fact they are still rendered at 4K and supersampled down to 1440P. Any help or advice would be great! TV doesn't actually support 1440p, jumps straight to 4k so I'll stick with 1080. And the visual quality is incredible still. 4k IPS vs 1440p OLED Im currently using the Gigabyte M28U together with my PS5 and a mac mini M1. Or check it out in the app stores Now the difference from 1440p to 4k is a lot closer as Ghost Recon Breakpoint runs at 1440p and is hard to tell it's not 4k. The PS5 has dedicated games designed to look great for the hardware. 0 would allow for a maximum refresh rate of 144 Hz, but the PS5 will output a max of 120 Hz, and only in compatible games. 4k in TVs it a complete gimmick, it's better utilized in computer monitors, but even then it's generally a waste when you 4K > 1440p Being 4K or an OLED do not, by themselves, guarantee good picture quality or a good gaming experience. To clarify, if playing on a 4K screen and have the PS5 set to output at 4K then use “Performance Smooth”. 1080p -> 1440p is also noticeable. Finaly for 4K, I have bought Asus 48" pg48uq. Probably 2160p, since I’d guess when you select 1440p it’s running the games that don’t have 1440p modes at 1080p, which will look blurry on a 1440p screen Reply reply   Because you are running either 4k downscaled to 1440p, with 4K frames per second, which is terrible in many games. The M28U was a very viable and important option before the impending update to support 1440p. Then I jumped to a 32 HDR 1440p and now this 34 ultra wide. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49 in 4K » ASUS TUF Gaming VG289Q1A – 4k, 60hz, freesync, good entry level 4k gaming monitor. if NVIDIA provided a simple lanczos based scaling like PS5/Xbox is doing for upscaling 1440p output games to 1080p and 4K screens, I'd actually use that. Vrr works with both resolutions on this monitor. But what is your question exactly and what is your context? Do you want a monitor TBH 60hz vs 144hz is often the biggest difference of what you listed, at least if you actually play at high fps to match it. Or check it out in the app stores And now I'm stuck deciding which monitor to get. I would recommend to go with 4K 60Hz. 32 inch 1440p starts to get distorted because of the loss of pixel density. Another thing, if you plan to use the monitor for console gaming, you can also game at 4k, since PS5 outputs a 1080p when connected to a 1440p monitor. This got me researching into ppi (pixels per inch) - turns out that a 27" 1440p and a 1080p 24" display have only 17 ppi difference, 92 to 109, which is very close. There are very few native 4K PS5 games especially the newer ones. If the games runs at native 4K on the PS5, then go for it. Edit 1: Thank you for answers. Truthfully only high end gpus can struggle to hit 120fps 4k the ps5/xsx has to make compromises to hit 120fps. I think if u go with 1440p it gets upscaled to 4k, (assuming u have a 1440/4k monitor), and u get to keep 120fps. So for Singleplayer adventure-type games I don't mind 30FPS as long I can definitely see a massive difference between, a 1440p monitor and a 5k 27" iMac. DLSS quality at 1440p is sup 1080p internally, while DLSS performance at 4K is 1080p internally. Still looks decent though, can't really tell its not native resolution from a glance but it's really stupid that the console doesn't support 1440p. STILL. Now this is a shocker of a take - day to day use, 4k honestly feels the same as 1080p. On a 1440p monitor, DLDSR + DLSS Performance Xbox Series X | S sub with the right name Discussion • Fan made • Games • Leaks • PC • News • Rumors • Reddit All things Xbox consoles and PC. I just bought a 1440p monitor today. Everything apart from gaming is just such a step up having moved from 1440p to 4k at the same screen size (27in). Cost: 1440p monitors are generally less expensive than 4K monitors. Just curious if this is will be the case with SF6 Hi all, so I have two monitors, one being 1440p and the other being 4k, both ips. Don't get me wrong, 4K is the crisper image, but it is MUCH harder to distinguish 1440p from 4K than the instant distinguishing of 1080p to 1440p I have owned the following: 16:9 1440p 60hz 16:9 4K 60hz 21:9 1440p 100hz The 1440p Ultrawide is hands down the best display period. Either way it’s great for being interchangeable between the two and gives you a lot of convenience. Higher end version of the one above. 1080p is too low and looks blurry. 1? upvote The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. Now, consider that games targeting 120fps, like call of duty cold war, don't actually run at 4k. A PC running 1440p without upscaling tech will look far better than the PS5. If I go with the 4k monitor, I’m afraid that I will not be noticing the difference in pixel It makes no difference. The output res will still be 4k ( if your tv supports it). 4K 144hz I’m of the opinion that 1440p = 720p, and 4k = 1080 It’s the new standard. 1440p vs 4k even on a 27 inches does make a noticeable Yea for movies,videos, and TV shows4K is better than 1440p for that. So my biggest question is if anyone who actually knows shit about monitors know if either of these are actually good. That’s not to say there’s anything wrong with 1440p, it’s a good mix of fidelity and performance, but the difference between that and 4k is night and day when it comes to pixel density/image quality. The I heard it does not support 1440p monitors but not sure anymore. Or you are going to run 1080p performance mode which would look way worse downscaled from 1440p than from 4k. In particular, foliage and hair rendering get WAY better It's not to say there isn't a difference at 16. Is 4k worth it for gaming now or is 1440p still it? However I’m curious if you believe the competitive gaming scene is going to prefer 1080p over 4k. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other casual I think 27 inch 1440p is the highest anyone should go for in terms of size. I dont play competitively or anything but what do you think would look the best I am comparing the asus vg27aql 27” vs Samsung s70a 32” Would it be good for a ps5? Reply Forward_Cobbler1319 Ryzen 5800x | 3080 | 32GB 3200MHz 44 votes, 42 comments. Visual fidelity and visual clarity are two different things. It’s saying I can’t do HDR and 2160p. PS5 on the console dashboard will show you are running at 2560x1440p 60hz but if you play a game that supports 120hz like Modern Warfare 2, it will switch to 120hz. maybe roam around Limgrave a bit PS4 Pro runs 1440p 30fps, PS5 runs 4K 30fps, not sure how they're the same, yeah games can also run at 1440p but it's literally 60fps which was never seen on any console generation before, (only a handful of ps4 pro games might run 1080-60fps on some performance mode but most devs didn't want to sacrifice the graphical fidelity) Would you recommend getting a 4k monitor which a 60Hz refresh rate, or getting a monitor with a higher refresh rate 120hz+ but only with a Quad HD resolution. 24in 1080p 144hz - » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. This is because our eyes are limited in 1440p 144hz » LG 27GN800-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. 1440p to 4k is a significant jump in clarity but to me it doesn't "feel" as big of a jump as 1080p to 1440p or at least doesn't feel worth it a lot of the time when you take the bigger performance hit into account. I can't speak to those exact dimensions. So I've bought a 1440p monitor for my PS5, and while it's on the way I've started to wonder what the picture quality will be like compared to a native 1440p image from a PC. Budget should not be an issue, however the 1440p monitor would most likely be 240hz whilst the 4k monitor would he 144hz. That gives you higher image quality - and because Sony does not support 1440p, it is your only chance to not having to play on 1080p. I have a ps5 and a series x nonetheless the new 4k 240hz monitors of msi,alienware,lg,Samsung etc will cost 3 times as much as a 1440p monitor. Moving from 1440p to 1080p for my RMA wasn't that big of a shock, in fact I got used to it pretty quick. There's 2 ways that you could be playing at 1440p vs 4k, and I'm not 100% certain which you mean. 1728 res on 1080p vs 1440p upvote so i decided to swap my PS5 over to the main monitor i use for my PC, which is 1440p, but also supports high refresh rate and HDR, vs my tv, which is 4k. I've been weighing up 4k @ 60hz vs 1440p (2k) @ 120 -165hz monitors, and I think I'm going to go for the latter. 1440p without upscaling will just look worse than 1440p on a native 1440p panel. Or check it out in the app stores   2023 1440p vs 4k high refresh rates . 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. 1440p vs 4k upvotes 4K 60 Hz vs 1440p 170 Hz for PS5 and PC My biggest issue is finding a monitor that is compatible with PS5 due to HDMI 2. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. However, most games are locked to 60. Hello, I am looking for a monitor and havent decided if I want 4K/60hz or 1440p/144hz. it still runs pretty poorly and 1440p 144hz » LG27GP850-B - IPS, - Reddit favorite mid-range monitor. Best bet is if the PS5 will support 1440p which the PS5 can handle at 120 fps. If you really only want one or the other and this is mostly a work setup, 4k was a no-brainer for me. Tbh with Sony's fuckery it seems just getting a native 1080p screen may be preferable. Running upscaled 1440p to 4k using FSR2 or DLSS is a great way to get almost native looking 4k with 1440 performance plus a small penalty. Monitor for PS5 and 1440p PC gaming. The big thing I’m stuck between is TV or a monitor? For my price range ($350) I’m stuck deciding between a 43inch 4k 60Hz TV and a 32inch 1440p 120Hz monitor. There is no clear answer to that I guess. If all you're changing is the output resolution on your PS5, then with the following question The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. So it won’t have any impact at all to performance. 5 inches between 1440p and 4k, but at regular viewing distance the PPI is so high that i don't see it worth the extra horse power I just wanted to give you my perspective on the 1440p vs. I heard people say PS5 can use 1440p but I also heard very often that the PS5 is only able to use 1080p or 4k and on a 1440p monitor it is using 1080p. 1440p is just a half way point like 720 was. I've also played since launch and have it on ps5 and pc. First struggle was between 4k IPS or 1440p Oled- have seen some issues reported by people with the 4k 240 Oled Alienware and am conscious of being an early adopter. If you are going to be close to the screen, go for a 1440p display. r/FortNiteBR. It will also output 1440p bandwidth. 6M subscribers in the PS5 community. ADMIN MOD 1440p vs 4k screen for MGSV on PS5 . Native 4K itself is difficult to achieve with constant high framerates, even for some high end PCs. For 144hz, see Gigabyte 4K or LG 27GN950-B » Dell S2721DGF - IPS, 1440p, 165hz, Freesync - Higher end but built on a great legacy. I know some other genres like shooters, most pros prefer 1080p or 1440p over 4k. Get the The Odyssey G7 is a native 1440p monitor, yes, but it has a built in scaler that will scale an incoming 4k signal down to 1440p and then display it, and it classifies itself as a 4k display to the console. Judging by your 4k 60hz monitor, I doubt it's a gaming monitor with fast response times and a good panel. Reply reply /r/GuildWars2 is the primary community for Guild Wars 2 on Reddit. Thats partially because 1440p monitors are mostly at 27 inches, and so are 4k, but 1080p monitors are typically 21-24 inch. Text can look a lot better on 4K. The monitor itself has a setting to where it can still be set to 4k on each console but I’m pretty sure it’s just downscaled to 1440p. However, when talking about large TVs at longer viewing distances you cannot tell the difference between 1080p and 4k on a 65" TV from 9'. So while 4k isn't the highest standard of visual fidelity it is currently the highest in visual clarity. I’ve seen a lot of people confused by this as well. A 1440p/2K monitor using HDMI 2. Or check it out in the app stores Does ps5 even do 4K downscale to 1440p? I thought it was either output 4K, or downscaled right down to 1080p. The only reason to pick 1440p would be hardware restrictions, or spending/cost restrictions. If you are getting ps5/xsx then I would honestly get 60hz or possibly wait for something good to show up. But at the same time I wonder if it would be worth experiencing 4k gaming. Hi there something to consider some 1440p monitors do accept a 4k signal then downsample or something with the ps5 for 60hz, then they also do 1080 120, for the 4k option you could look at the lg c1/cx 48 should be on sale for around £800-1000 still alot I guess And if you want 48inches, i think I seen the lg 48 A1 for £650 but is only 60hz A bigger difference than 1080p to 1440p in your same distance example. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. But then you go back to 1440p and realise how much blurrier it is. As far as my eyes can see the difference between 1440 and 4k on a 27 inch is equally gigantic. I don't know how easy it is to switch between the modes, but if it's not that much of a hassle, I'd do this: in competitive Multiplayer games, like fps games, you should go for 120 fps, because it can help you play better if you have more fps, and in single player games, where the atmosphere might be more important, then 60 fps should be enough, and 4k is 30 to 40fpsonly 1080p and 1440p have 60ps with occasional dips. When you set the ps5 to 4k, the ps5 will push out 4k image/bandwidth. This at least dulls the problem until we get actual 4K monitors or Sony patches in 1440p native output. Or check it out in the app stores   unlike scaling to 1440p. 1 port if u With monitor-sampling being the process where a non-1440p monitor either up or downsamples the PS5's output; and with PS5-sampling being the console offering a 1440p output, but either up or downsampling the graphics internally, depending on the game's graphics modes (performance vs I'm looking to upgrade my PS5/PC monitor and I'm trying to decide between 1440p vs 4k. I will get a 4K sometime down the line, but for now, it's not really a big deal Hey so i have a 1440p monitor and will soon have PS5, of course the PS5 doesn't support 1440p so it will output 1080p and thus the image won't be so Open menu Open navigation Go to Reddit Home r/techsupport A chip A close button Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Performance: The PS5 can output games at 1440p up to 120fps. However, does it support 1440p on 4K tv? Example: Metal Gear Solid V runs 1440p on ps4 pro so if I played it on my ps5, would the game display 1080p or 1440p on my 4K tv? Thank you. Reply reply BearWrap • Is there really any difference between 4K and 1440p on monitors smaller than 30 in? Because I'd much rather have 144 Hertz than 4K 60fps unless there's a big visual difference. I feel like you would have to upgrade your gpu more often in order to keep pushing 4K on new titles. HDMI 2. And honestly, that sucks. To me, 1440P monitor seems crisper than a 4K tv because the pixels match better. 1440p is a nice step up from 1080p, and the PS5 supports it so you should definitely go for it. is it worth upgrading to a 1440p monitor Does the ps5 upscale 1080 p naitive to 1440p with no issue in image quality I wanna play the new lord of the fallen in 1080p in 60fps and I don't know if it will look better in a 2k monitor The whole 1440p at native vs. There said native 4k was never that big of a boost over 1440p. The developer supported, community run subreddit dedicated to the Fortnite: Battle Royale game mode by Epic For those two things, 1440p is probably fine. 4k or 1440p/HDMI 2. I'm also wondering I have a RTX 3060 and a PS5, and plan to play on either 1440p or 4k respectively. »Alienware AW2721D – 1440p, 240hz, IPS, G-Sync, Just a beast of a monitor Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. So I think your question is really 4k 60Hz vs 1440p 144Hz. The difference between 1440p and 4K is still noticeable, however I don’t think it’s that much of a leap in terms of visual quality to the end user. » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. It looks great and your frames will still be high. If image interpolation is used for upscaling then 1440p to 4K will look better than 1080p to 4K because there is significantly more input information. I just wanted to give you my perspective on the 1440p vs. If you're on the "60FPS is good enough" camp, then yeah, 4K will probably make sense. FSR 2. » LG27GP850-B – Native 165hz. Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. Another part is 1440p to 4k is just a bigger jump proportionately than 1080 to 1440. and directly support Reddit. I'll take the Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. Rdna2 5M subscribers in the PS5 community. The size doesn’t matter to me as I can sit as close or far as I want. The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub for PS5 & VR2 news and discussion. And in this sense it will be. I also own a PS5 that I use with it. It's really not "bad", and I seriously doubt you'll have the time to notice, frame by frame, whatever marginal differences one sees on 4K vs 1440p (assuming you have all the necessary hardware, costing as much as an OLED TV, and the cables to transmit reliably to 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Dell G2724D for mid range - IPS, 165hz, Reddit favorite monitors. My brother plays on a 1440p 120hz monitor on PS5 and it doesn't actually output 1440p, only 1080p. 1 and are capable of 4k 120hz. But I went from 1440p 27" to a 4k 48" TV and there is a pretty massive difference in quality, you get use to it quickly and it just seems normal after awhile. Most actually run at 1080 or 1440p and are upscaled to 4k. This is pretty I'm in the beta for 1440p support but I have a monitor that support 4k downscale, which one is better? Outputting a native resolution is likely to be better because a GPU can rescale more Simpy put, if you want to sit on the sofa and be far from the screen, it's better to have a larger 4K display. 4k is a lot sharper and I really cannot see any pixels or blockiness, where as with 1440p I can see blockiness in things like text and it's nowhere near as sharp. In other words, a game running 4K high/medium will look better than a game running 1440p ultra. The difference between 1080 and 1440 when I upgraded laptops was huge. This setup goes really well and i have no complaints but i want an oled monitor so much and dont know if its worth to trade a 4k ips against a 1440p oled. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other So I wonder is it better to buy desktop 32" 4k or LG C3 and playing 1440p in more demanding titles, or is it better to buy 1440p desktop 27" Of course 27" 1440p monitor is better for my current specs, but it's not that future proof like 4k 32". So my assessment is that if you want 27 inch, 1440p 32 inch or higher, 4k. Or check it out in the app stores I don't like it. If you only game on a ps5 get a 4K 120Hz monitor. In contrast, the difference between 60hz and 120+ hz is massive to most people. 4k is great if you are far enough away, 1440p is better if you are closer to it. I’m looking to get a new screen for my gaming room on my ps5. I have a 32" LG32GN650-B, 27" Gigabyte M27Q, and the Gigabyte M28U and I can promise you that at 28", you aren't going to see any meaningful jumps in clarity and visual fidelity from 1440p to 4k in this screen size and considering the ppi (pixels per inch, pixel density). 720p -> 1080p is very noticeable. edit: Im going to go for the 1440p monitor, sorry for not responding to all replies I Most performance modes on ps5 don't run at 4k anyways usually 1440p-1800p some do run native 4k 60 but AAA games like horizon forbidden west does not render at native 4k so the ps5 upscales it. I play on smaller monitors with low input lag so I don’t care about 4K. If you are gaming it can be a big investment to buy a 4k monitor and video card and possibly a psu depending on the video card. Hz will work to make your FPS a little smoother cause it is Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now the difference from 1440p to 4K is night-and-day. As 1080p vs 4k really does give the gpu alot of headroom Reply reply More replies. For reference, my build has a 3080 and a 5800X3D. Games rendered at 4K downscaled to 1440p look great, the responsiveness of 120hz is lovely, and you have the option to switch to a 4K signal, if you get a monitor that allows it. Setting resolution to 4k looks sharper in my opinion. Take a 4k image of the game and put it up to a 1440p image of the same game. The best combo monitors is pg48uq for 4K and racing and casual games, and pg27aqn for FPS games 1440p 165hz even a 6950xt at 1440p which beats the 3090ti in 1440p framerates cant really pump 240 fps at 1440p in every game outside of esports titles i and forget about 4k at 144 thats just a pipe dream without dropping settings to low or medium without using upscaling which imo if you bought the horsepower why drop to 1080p for rendering and Would playing a 60 fps game on a 4K 60hz or 120hz feel smoother than playing on a 1440p 165hz monitor? GOW Ragnarok doesn't feel like 60 fps to me when i pan the camera around fast, yet when I broadcast the game to my twitch and play it back, it looks smooth. OLED_Gaming a 3080 there is no reason to play on 1080p or 1440p displays if you care for the image quality because even with a base PS5 games are better on a 4k display View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. 1440 vs 4k at 27 inch is almost unnoticeable in game. I'd be curious what 4k 70Hz monitor you are referring to. I definitely overspent on my setup to reach high FPS 4k gaming. On a small monitor like that the difference between 4k and 1440p will be tough to notice. VRR is fully enabled so I'll download the ps5 version after work and see how it goes. 4k is an even bigger leap over 1440p. I have heard some things about fps problems on the PS5 and alot of people saying to avoid it completely, but currently my PC struggles running most recent games above low graphics on 1440p without reaching above 80 degrees. Not every game supports fsr either mind you. Also, if you get a smaller 4k monitor the print is quite small. One of the reasons i use a 32 inch 4k. i switched from 4k to 1440p not long ago to get a higher refresh rate, and I can very much tell the difference. I see that Alienware is releasing a 1440p and a 4k oled in the beginning of January, along with asus releasing a 4k oled by then as well. Best combo of performance and value. 1440p 144hz » Acer Nitro for budget, LG27GP850-B or Asus VG27AQ for mid range - IPS, Reddit favorite monitors. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 140hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz OP, not all games support 120fps, so it really comes down to your personal usage. Often OOS »Samsung Odyssey G5 – Curved and sometimes on a great sale. I once played with 4k 60 fps on ps5 and I thought it looked great but for the moment I would choose 240 hz. There are just a few 120fps cross-gen titles and once games are current-gen-only you won't see new 120fps releases anymore Most 120fps modes actually run 80-120fps at 1080p with noticable worse visuals. Size matters. PS5 does not support VRR at 1440p. A separate but related question is how good would 4K downscaled to 1440p look on a 1440p monitor, or 1440p upscaled with fsr to 4K on a 1440p monitor. Would you rather go slightly smaller and run a PS5/XSX/PC on 1440p or wait and get the larger 32in 4k but also have to build a completely new PC (current set up is an i7-9700k/2070S) Money isn’t an issue but it’s also not freely available. In 120hz mode in CoD (which you should be playing on) the game maxes out at 1440p anyway. 0 can upscale decently at 4K from 1440p Although I find that DLSS Quality 4K (which is upscaled from 1440p) looks definitely better than native 1440p But you are using an AMD card and not Nvidia so don’t really worry about DLSS, FSR 2. The monitor will accept 4k image and shrink it to fit 1440p. A community for pros and newbs. 4k scaled things is giving me doubts because, as demonstrated by some of the replies in this thread, a popular opinion seems to be that '4k scaled is a little blurry but still a lot crisper than a lower-res display at native res'. Go with 1440p. 3ms, Just a beast of a monitor Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » LG 34GP83-AB - IPS, one of the fav on reddit. What I'm torn about is which to get. Meanwhile a 4k monitor at 27" has a ppi of 163 - much closer to an iMac's resolution. 1440p looks fine, but 4K with some scaling even the desktop will wow you when it comes to stuff like text and icon clarity. I would rather That's downscaling 4k to 1440p but is still 1440p which yes can be sharper depending on the quality of downscale on monitor. The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now I do notice the difference in quality between 1440p and 4K just don't know if it's worth it at the cost of frames. You will have a major positive experience gaming with a 1440p gaming ultra wide versus a 4k 60hz that probably isn't a gaming monitor with high response times. Hdr on monitors is often hit or miss. 1 unless you want 120 Hz 4K. I am stuck between 27in -32in 144-240hz and 1440p vs 4k. (1080p vs 960p), so DLSS Performance, while using DLDSR 2. » LG ‎27GR95QE-B - OLED, 240hz, . I'm thinking If I should by a 1440p OLED gaming monitor or a 4k gaming monitor. Even playing games like League on 4k, I don't notice it that different from 1080p. 1440p 27" is already 109 PPI, that's not amazing but it's actually a sweetspot for GPU performance, it's not insane clarity like a 4k 27" which has 150 PPI or so but it's also not I have a 4K sony oled and I just got the PS5 as well. 0 or some other upscaler to achieve a "4k" image. If you set ps5 to 1440p, the ps5 will do the shrinking. I sit further back enough to where I have about the same fov that I do with 27inch. I can tell the difference between framerates it's very obvious the 4k setting is no where close to 60 fps. So it's a two piece, internal res is lower at the 1440p output and it has less reconstruction work needed so it's gonna run noticeably better But with a great looking singleplayer game you're probably gonna play with a controller? It actually feels like I'm playing on a 27 1440p 16:9 monitor, which I use to play on. 1440p is no where near 1080p in terms of usage, it will be a long time bruh 1440p is at 12% while 1080p 65% yeah "soon" btw 2020 was a few years ago and from what i know 1080p was the standard back then as well, i didnt hear anyone debated over 720p or 1080p about that stuff because clearly it was 1080p Hello guys, I have an AOC CQ32G1 monitor, and I already know that it is able to run some PS5 games at 120Hz with 1080p resolution. 120 only works on a select few I'm using a Samsung G5 Odyssey, and have been since well before the 1440p patch, it was one of several 1440 monitors that were able to accept a 4K signal and downscale it. For example, if you were to put a 1080p game or a DVD into a PS5 with 4k capabilities, it'll take that original media and upscale it to 4k, which means it's When I used my 28" 4k I had to use windows scaling for everything because the PPI was so high. 4k matters once you go larger. I would go 4k for 32in+ monitors. I think PS5 actually looks better on a 1440P screen. I would recommend it in a heartbeat but again, this is just my If yes, a high refresh rate 1440p 27" is the best balance for gaming. Even if you can get good FPS on 4k today, tomorrow it will that much harder to run, and the details on 1440p is generally enough, it's a huge difference from 1080p and at 27 inch pretty much nearly Your community-run home for all things PlayStation on Reddit! Console/game discussions, news, support, trophy/media sharing and more! No chance I'm noticing the difference between 1440p and 4K at that distance. The 4k is a 16:9, (3840 X 2160). 5. But you will need at least a 1080Ti. My concern is whether this monitor is able to accept 4K signal from PS5 and afterwards downscaling to 1440p (good image quality), or is it only able to accept 1080p signal from PS5, therefore upscaling to 1440p (bad image quality)? Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. As someone who got a 4k montior instead of a 1440p, I would say generally don't go for 4k unless you have a productivity usecase for the 4k screen. Which coming from ps5 that’s incredible. However now the big decision to make is : 4k 60hz monitor or 1080p 144hz , keen to get a 27 inch monitor but a bit worried that 1080p on a 27 inch monitor will look a bit coarse. This But I searched a bunch of forums/reddit/DF for Performance vs Quality modes/comparisons for both Demon’s Souls and Spider-Man MM. On top of that, because gaming is 90% of usage -- I was losing a ton of fps for the pleasure of more clarity. I have a ps5 and XSX only on that tv so I didn't need more than two. Not only now, but for the next couple of years too. Your community-run home for all things PlayStation on Reddit! Console/game discussions, news, support, trophy/media sharing and more! VRR, 120Hz), and even at 28” I notice the difference between 1440p and 4k, but I use my PS5 sitting at close range on a computer desk. But with a 4090, you could definitely game on 4K. If you hooked up a ps5 to a 1440p monitor it would just stretch the systems output resolution and look weird. They actually run between 1080p and 1440p, then get upscaled to 4k. Sure, if I were to play a game on a small 27" or 34" monitor then the difference between 1440p and 4K is quite small, but playing on a 4K on a 65" TV? I find it to have somewhat of a difference. Best combos of performance and value. Recently just purchased a PS5 and have a 4k screen already. A PS5 is pretty powerful, but not that powerful, uses all kinds of "tricks" to boost FPS or 4k. Could pick up the 27 today or would need to save up and hope for some good Black Friday deals on pc Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now though. Reply reply 1440p is best for 4K displays. VA panel. The 4k sampling to 1440p doesn't work with all 1440p monitors though right? I think some won't recognise 4k and instead do 1080p>1440p which won't look great. I think the math works out that beyond like 30 inches most people can't differentiate between the individual pixels of a 27in 1440p monitor. Especially in games. 1 connection, HDR support, variable refresh rate (VRR) and low input lag. i wanted to use FF16 as a test for this, since i figured going down to the lower res would help performance, but i can't see any discernable improvement to performance in that game. The 1440p is a 21:9, (3440 X 1440). Oddly PUBG renders at 1440 from the game but the ps5 will technically sample 4k to 1440 on that game Since the PS5 does not support 1440p natively an upgrade to a 1440p 144hz monitor ( which I think is the sweet spot ) is out of the question. And there's 144Hz 4K monitors coming later this year, but not even a 1080Ti can drive 4K at 100FPS. I'll be going for a 32 inch monitor so it's going to visually look good regardless. And the 1440p is clearly sharper. On the flip side, 144Hz is definitely an experience all on its own. 1 Port. I'll throw in another query: if I do plan on getting a ps5 aswell down a few years, should I consider getting the 4k120? I hear doubts about 4k@ 27in is not very noticeable compared to 1440p@ 27in unless you sit very, very close to your monitor. And more miss Good post here for monitors typically recommended for PS5/Xbox. DLSS Performance in 4K is actually a higher internal resolution than DLSS Quality in 1440p. the new Consoles (at least PS5) is getting a 1440p update so you can use that Monitor for that too since you mentioned it. Personally, I will keep rocking my 9 year old 1080p Bravia TV for years to come. 32” 4k is noticeably clearer than 32” 1440p, but 4k isn’t really mandatory unless the monitor is over 32”. This means that games will look sharper on a 1440p monitor than on a 1080p monitor, but not as sharp as on a 4K monitor. That really sucks. Contrast is ok man, I have been playing CS2/NFS Heat/COD MW 2019, I think at best on 1440p (Ryzen 7 5700X + Nvidia 4070). 4k on ps5 cant always keep 120 but that depends on the game. I'm happy to focus primarily on higher fps 1440p with occasional 4k TV gaming (even then I find myself leaning toward 120fps 1440p over 60fps 4k). If you are OK working with x1 1440p and 4k each, splitting the difference isn't a bad idea. Fsr upscaled will look better but perform worse. between native 4K@30fps and fake4K@60fps? This is doable by developers to implement on Ultrawide 1440p 144hz » MSI OPTIX 341CQR - VA, great budget option for a gaming ultrawide. Contrast is ok. Or check it out in the app stores 4k oled vs 1440p oled . the on the bx only 2 of the hdmis are 2. Granted the 1440p is 27" and the 1080p is 24. I've used it on PS3, PS4 Pro and now PS5. Even in titles that don't render natively at 4k, the PS5 dashboard and game UI interfaces all will render in crisp 4k, with the game geometry The Reddit home for PlayStation 5 - your hub PS5 news and discussion. The Alienware is a one trick pony and it has an anti reflective Get the Reddit app Scan this QR code to download the app now. That’s not really true, because a 32” 1440p monitor has the same PPI as a 24” 1080p monitor, and 24” is generally considered the upper limit for 1080p. Expect a 1440p The reason this question has been crossing my mind a lot lately is that the new Last of Us Remake will render at either 4K or 1440p depending on your resolution output selection, and I want the best possible picture quality out of that game. Many PS5 games like TLOU2 run at 1440p yet look good on a 4K TV because there is enough resolution for a basic upscale to look good. 1440p 144hz vs 4k 60hz comments. Members Online. . Recently I've been playing a lot of console games on my ps5 so I've been using my 4k. Even a 2 grand rtx 3090ti will only give you 144 if ya lucky. 4k debate. The home for everything Metal Gear on reddit Members Online • lilpp_36. It supports 1440p as a native output resolution now as well. This is a good option for gamers who want to play games at high frame rates. Or check it out in the app stores I'm split between getting a 4k model that can do 4k@60hz and 1440p@120hz VS one that can do 4k@120hz. probably mostly just because it happened to go on sale overnight and it was about half price compared to the 4k one :p 27" 1440p looks ok Then I have bought the asus 1440p 360hz, and it's perfect for CSGO, in BF5/2042, it's very very good, awesome with Sandstorm. I’m running a 3090 with an 8700k just fine, 170+ frames in most games while fully maxed, and that’s an OLD ass chip. bedulge • 1080 is fine, at typical viewing distance, the difference between 4k and 1080 is not massive. I would prefer 1440p 144hz for future PC upgrades, but I'm hesitant to pull the trigger for numerous reasons including whether the downscaled image looks good or not, the likelihood of Sony eventually enabling 1440p on the PS5, and whether the PS5 will even be able to output 4k at > I don't know the exact numbers for Dirt 5 on PS5, but assuming it is the same as on the Series X it runs 4K 60FPS or 1440P 120FPS in high performance mode, and the system still converts that 1440P rendered image to 4K when outputting to a TV that supports a 4K 120hz input. No it isnt mate lol 4k is just visually pleasing 1080p and 1440p are still the most competitive resolutions and most used. So, running at 1440p, and letting your TV upscale to 4k, basically is the same exact thing, except 1440p 4k monitors need a pricy video card to drive them for gaming. Just got my series X and looking at monitors. I also feel like it would be a shame to get an OLED with a matte cover and think the MPG 321URX QD-OLED looks like a better long term goal. get reddit premium. 4k 60 hz vs 1440p 120hz . But upscaling technologies (like DLSS) get better and better, they are - in my opinion - one of the most important new inventions we had in the last years in the gaming sector. Best bang for your buck is OLED 42-48 inch. A Mini LED IPS panel with a quantum dot layer and those features hangs with an OLED in terms of picture quality. It's also While 32" 4k is only 25%-ish more ppi than 27" 1440p, the added pixel count brings out a lot of details in games. If you have extra budget, see Samsung Odyssey G9 to get 240hz and 49in or Alienwaire AW3423DWF for OLED, 175hz 4K For a good list compiled by a redditor, see here for considerations and recommendations » BenQ EX2710U – 4k, 144hz, poor HDR. I think it depends on the game. 1440p is still what I'd recommend for most, but the difference is certainly there. The ps5 wont ever run games like warzone 120fps on 4k it just never will happen. To my knowledge none exist (except the LG LG 27UK670-B, which is 75Hz and discontinued). So, in short, as long as your PS5 is set to 4K and your monitor can downscale from 4K then it will never upscale from 1080p, which was the main problem with 1440p monitors and the PS5, ofc direct 1440p from the PS5 would be better. Consider joining r/PlayStation for your daily dose of memes, screenshots, and other casual discussion. It'd still be a larger percent increase between 4K and 1440p (~45%) at 27" vs 1440p and 1080p (~37%) at 27", but there are also diminishing returns. Despite what others may say, even 4K at 27" is a massive visual upgrade. Don't get me wrong the 32in still looks good, the 27in just looks better. chgox nqgeqr mvek rtkgkwy avmkqf xoukmc cxtrf odcj uxrwfvqt vkv