Best sdxl upscaler reddit It changes the image too much and often adds mutations. However, the SDXL refiner obviously doesn't work with SD1. SDXL - BEST Build + Upscaler + Steps Guide. More posts from r/universvideos subscribers . But for upscale in my opinion I got best results with Deep-Image. For latent upscalers you need at least 0. litekite_ • Additional comment I've never had good luck with latent upscaling in the past, which is "Upscale Latent By" and then re-sampling. Doesn't seem to have the issue with some other models where some areas The 4X-NMKD-Superscale-SP_178000_G model has always been my favorite for upscaling SD1. I’ve just been using Hires Fix, and am totally unfamiliar with the first two. 5 or SDXL images using SD1. No Asian bias as far as I can see (but there's a new bias inherent in SDXL personally, I won't suggest to use arbitary initial resolution, it's a long topic in itself, but the point is, we should stick to recommended resolution from SDXL training resolution (taken from SDXL paper). I need it in order to upscale the images I get with Stable Diffusion. /r/StableDiffusion is back open after the protest of Reddit killing open API access, which will bankrupt app developers, hamper moderation, and exclude blind users from the site. johnkoubeck • If you're using SDXL, you can try experimenting and seeing which LoRAs can achieve a similar effect. So I recommend SDXL. Super late here but is this still the case? I've got CCSR & TTPlanet. I suggest you keep an eye on the website for future updates, or manually uninstall the Efficiency Node Suite and reinstall it I'd never ignore a post I saw asking for help :D So when I refer to denoising it, I am referring to the fact that the lower resolution faces caused by using Reactor need to be denoised if you want to add more resolution, this requires passing through a sampler with denoising, the higher the denoising is on this sampler the more it will change and mess the face back up again. Maybe if we had a huge model trained only on common people, from amateur, family photos, we could generate better people (better skin texture, lighting 114 votes, 43 comments. 25, then up cfg scale 8 to 12 or so, then you will get a lot of micro details without random houses and people or whatever is in your prompt, play around with denoise, it thats too high, you will get floaties, if its too low the upscaling will look grainy. How do you think he get such a level of skin detail? Maybe he was just talking about not using the SDXL refiner and used a realistic 1. I think you’d View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. for your case, the target is 1920 x 1080, so initial recommended latent is 1344 x 768, then upscale it to 1. SDXL can indeed generate a nude body, and the model itself doesn't stop you from fine-tuning it towards whatever spicy stuff there is with a dataset, at least by the looks of it. 5 model? Reddit iOS Reddit Android Reddit Premium About Reddit Advertise Blog Careers Press. I also see the Automatic1111 Ultjmate SD Upscaler extension. 5 model we'd sometimes generate images of heads/feet cropped out because of the autocropping to 512x512 used in training images. 429 If using downscale factor after using 4x-Upscaler Node = ( 1. comments SDXL 1. ) But in this post the OP is using the leaked SDXL 0. SwinIR_4x shows stable average results in all tests. Only instanID works like magic, but i can't run it on my laptop cuz the shitty thing can't handle sdxl i only use the demo version and it can't make realistic images. That's why i need a good upscaler that will smooth over those areas, but it will also not compromise on my character's features. 4 for denoise for the original SD Upscale. It needs to be an XL based Lora if you use it anywhere to the left of the upscaler. I have 3070 8gb. SDXL base was just as bad as SD3. The upscaler is SD1. also use 768 or 1024 Thanks, I thought I was going crazy when I did my own testing. 3M is the best for "photorealism" as it can generate unmatched skin quality, but it requires enormous amounts of steps. ULTIMATE LORA SDXL 1. 22 votes, 25 comments. But it is extremely light as we speak, so much so the Civitai guys probably wouldn't even consider that NSFW at all. The left side is my "control group" - ESRGAN upscaler, denoise 0. Please share your tips, tricks, and 39 votes, 18 comments. You have a bunch of custom things in here that arent necessary to demonstrate "TurboSDXL + 1 Step Hires Fix Upscaler", and basically wasting our time trying to find things because you dont even provide I'm not at the PC, but I think there is one in the base sampler node, so put it there. The downside is that it takes a very long time. 0. 5 and SD2. SD Upscaler doesn't just upscale the picture like Photoshop would do (which you also can do in automatic1111 in the "extra" tab), they regenerate the image so further new detail can be added in the new higher resolution which didn't exist I’ve been seeing news lately about ControlNet’s tile model for upscaling. I have a question: what's the purpose of the 'sdxl_lightning_8step_lora'? Curious to know why it has the 8step name. Do SD upscale with upscaler A using 5x5 (basically 512x512 tilesize, 64 padding) [1] Send to extras, and upscale (scale 4) with upscaler B. Although if you fantasize, you can imagine a system with a star much larger than the Sun, which at the end of its life cycle will not swell into a red Comfyui SDXL upscaler / hires fix Sorry for the possibly repetitive question, but I wanted to get an image with a resolution of 1080x2800, while the original image is generated as 832x1216. 2 to 0. Adjust the widh and high to double dimension. Go to universvideos r/universvideos • by johnkoubeck. At least mage and playground stayed free for more than a year now, so maybe their freemium business model is at least sustainable. 3, no added noise or other changes. Latent upscalers are pure latent data expanders and don't do pixel-level interpolation like image upscalers do. I’ve been meaning to make sure my SDXL workflow itself didn’t need fine tuning before I post something just like this. FHD Scaling factor to reach 1920 x 1080 calculated from ( SDXL Width ) to avoid shortage, you can crop ( Final Height ) excess later Scale factor : 1. 21K subscribers in the comfyui community. 25-0. If it wasn’t for the licensing issues I would still have hope for future SD3 model releases Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. TLDR: I think the winner is again "GoddessOfRealism Pony Beta", it has the most realistic lighting, and also best anatomy, including the wings, and prompt following. I I am interested in your workflow, do you upscale by a factor of 2 with ESRGAN, then by another factor of 2 with Ultrasharp ? ERSGAN looks really nice but as you said, on fine lines, like hair on those pics I posted, you can see they are so Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. Now days, the top three free sites are tensor. Hope everyone is having a great day, be kind, be creative! SDXL 1. Thank you for your post and for sharing your question, comment, or creation with our group! Our welcome page and more information, can be found here. bin file for CLIP2) Modify SUPIR_v0. "High budget" is from the SDXL style selector. SDXL Lightning 8-step Lora + Any SDXL model + SDXL finetuning & Latent Upscaler (workflow incl. Hit generate. On the other hand, there is UniPC which is very fast and can generate pretty good images with as low as 5 steps, so it's great for things like XYZ plot script when you want to quickly compare something. This can let you really play around with refiner step much MUCH further than with the standard SDXL refiner model depending on how well your model choices play Modify CKPT_PTH. 5, using one of ESRGAN models usually gives a better result in Hires Fix. 5 based, so you can use any 1. 4 works best. Like many XL users out there, I’m also new to ComfyUI and very much just a beginner in this regard. 9 model to act as an upscaler. If it's the best way to install control net because when I tried manually doing it . comments sorted by Best Top New Controversial Q&A Add a Comment. The higher the denoise number the more things it tries to change. Use the same seed as your base img. As a whole, SDXL does a much better job at just changing the hair, and not the entire model. I always get two images in my extras folder when I use both. VRAM is King. While these newer SDXL models are definitely getting better, they still struggle with finer details, especially the eyes, skin textures, nipples etc. 12gb is enough for a SDXL model, some LoRAs and, most importantly, ControlNet and IP Adapter all used together. The right upscaler will always depend on the model and style of image you are generating; Ultrasharp works well for a lot of things, but sometimes has artifacts for me with very In SD 1. ) Thanks for taking the time to do that. 8192x8192 image saved as A2B. Sorry about that. It's a solid and fast tool, I've been using it for 2 years now. Both of them give me errors as "C:\Users\shyay\Desktop\ComfyUI_windows_portable\ComfyUI\comfy\ldm\modules\attention. After that repeat again. I took a 2-4 month hiatus, basically when the OG upscale checkpoints came out like SUPIR so I have no heckin' idea what is the go-to these days. I’ll create images at 1024 size and then will want to upscale them. 0 if the base resolution is not too high) because it allow you to use greater batch sizes, and has virtually no processing time cost. I'm creating some cool images with some SD1. Nov 2022: Since this post I had been working on a website where all my comparison examples are gathered in one place. 25, 1. 0 Base SDXL 1. 2 and 0. That's because of the model upscale. The right side uses the Siax upscaler and the above settings. Been holing up at civitai but sdxl checkpoints are not that as The SDXL controlnet tile model by TTPlanet is actually quite good. In my opinion the best results I got for image upscale with https://deep-image. I know about masks, of course. ControlNets and FaceDetailer are broken. I mostly go for realism/people with my gens and for that I really like 4x_NMKD-Siax_200k, it handles skin texture quite well but does some weird things with hair if the upscale factor is too large. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this 37 votes, 44 comments. You're a YouTube Video Creator or Twitch Streamer? NewTubers is the Premiere "Small Content Creator" Community, created to allow up-and-coming channels to improve with resources, critiques, and cooperation among tens of thousands of peers! I have good results with SDXL models, SDXL refiner and most 4x upscalers. For self-promotion, please only post here. Which upscaler do you use to upscale your latent before passing it to the second ksampler? I wouldn't HAVE to use an SD15 checkpoint for that second ksampler, right? What are the benefits you see in using an SD15 there instead of the same original SDXL checkpoint? Also, would you happen to have a clean workflow that demonstrates this idea? Yes, I agree with your theory. However, Step 1 - Text to image: Prompt varies a bit from picture to picture, but here is the first one: high resolution photo of a transparent porcelain android man with glowing backlit panels, closeup on face, anatomical plants, dark swedish SDXL Width : 1344 SDXL Height : 768 Scaling Factor. 5 and am not really looking back. I've been using Photoshop for 20 years, so that is kinda a given ;) The controlnets are working differently in SDXL as well, though. View community ranking In the Top 1% of largest communities on Reddit. fix: a simple way to upscale your images while they’re being generated. 429x. I'm pretty happy, so long I had a lot of errors with v-RAM when I tried to upscale pictures, and this script usually works like a charm. 429 / 4 ) Downscale AFTER 4x-Upscaler Node usage : 0. Hey Yall, do you have any recommendations? From what I've seen I've been pretty disappointed by examples and from my own testing I've yet to see many The "Upscaler 2" is if you want a second version of your upscale done at the same time unless it combines the two and I'm unware of that. Find us on Discord here. 357 1440p Scaling factor to reach 2560 x 1440 calculated from ( SDXL Width ) to avoid shortage, There’s a custom node that basically acts as Ultimate SD Upscale. Hello! How are people upscaling SDXL? I’m looking to upscale to 4k and probably 8k even. 5 models and I don't get good results with the upscalers either when using SD1. Sounds like the multipurpose choice? In relation to the previous point, I recommend using Clarity Upscaler combined with tools like Upscayl, as this achieves much better results. However, when upscaling Flux images with an SD1. Directly tying in with hair styles are face shapes, because in theory, you should select a hairstyle that best matches your face shape. I appreciate the improvement in prompt understanding that SDXL has, but achieving images with fine details that look spontaneous and natural requires a lot of effort. I have switched over to the Ultimate SD Upscale as well and it works the same for the most part, only with better results. It doesn't turn out well with my hands, unlucky. The upscalers used here are: UniversalUpscalerV2-Neutral (denoted as Hello Friends, Could someone guide me on efficiently upscaling a 1024x1024 DALLE-generated image (or any resolution) on a Mac M1 Pro? I'm quite new to this and have been using the "Extras" tab on Automatic1111 to upload and upscale images without entering a prompt. It is tuning for Anime like images, which TBH is kind of bland for base SDXL because it was tuned mostly for non SDXL has some parameters that SD 1 / 2 didn't for training: original image size: w_original, h_original and crop coordinates: c_top and c_left (where the image was cropped, from the top-left corner) So no more random cropping during training, and no more heads cut off during inference. 7, for non-latent upscalers you will get best results under 0. (There’s custom nodes for pretty much everything, including ADetailer. Same with SDXL, you can use any two SDXL models as the base model and refiner pair. 4x-UltraSharp is a decent general purpose upscaler. You can expect ~20 seconds per image, 1024x1024, 30 steps, DPM++ 2M SDE Karras. 5 denoise works very nice. I can regenerate the image and use latent upscaling if that’s the best way I’m struggling to find IMHO the best use case for Latent upscalers is in highres fix, with a reasonable upscale (1. This new comparison now should be more accurate with seeing which is the best realistic model that still retains pony capabilities, and how it compares I've struggled with Hires. I can upscale up to x16, but it has many other features, such as light correction, denoise, deblur, image generator etc. r/StableDiffusion Found a pretty good way to get good pics without highres fix : you generate normal 512 img, send it to img2img. 5 and in my experience 0. SDXL 1. 5 or XL checkpoints. fix and Loopback Scaler either don't produce the desired output, meaning they change too much about the image (especially faces), or they don't increase the details enough which causes the end result to look too smooth (sometimes losing details) or even blurry and For now, only the SDXL Base + Refiner + Upscaler work. true. In the 1. It didn't work out. 1. 0 Training! - Best SDXL LoRA Training Tutorial Yet. 0 Refiner Automatic calculation of the steps required for both the Base and the Refiner models Quick selection of image width and height based on the SDXL training set XY Plot ControlNet with the XL OpenPose model (released by Thibaud Zamora) Do you have ComfyUI manager. Face Shapes. 5, sometimes 2. 3) and sampler without "a" if you dont want big changes from original. I found it to work better than several other upscalers. 5 is still the best in that department. fix and other upscaling methods like the Loopback Scaler script and SD Upscale. But in SDXL, I find the ESRGAN models tend to oversharpen in places to give UniversalUpscalerV2-Sharper provides a nice amount of high frequency artifacts, which when img2img'd or hires fix'd turns into detail since its treated as noise. Please share your tips, tricks, and workflows for using this software to create your AI art. Then click on option "just resize latent upscale". Comparison of using ddim as base sampler and using different schedulers 25 steps on base model (left) and refiner (right) base model I believe the left one has more detail so back to testing comparison grid comparison between 24/30 (left) using refiner and 30 steps on base only Refiner on SDXL 0. 4x_NMKD-Siax_200k is good for detailed art and photorealistic (for photos too) but this result is not enough good for art or anime. This can add detail that Thanks. The one big difference is that you are supposed to be able to go up to 0. So I spent 30 minutes, coming up with a workflow that would fix the faces by SDXL was trained on a lot of 1024x1024 images so this shouldn't happen on the recommended resolutions. And when purely upscaling, the best upscaler is called LDSR. I have 2 galleries of SD15 in civitai that you can check out if you want, It use upscaler and then use sd to increase details. For now, only the SDXL Base + Refiner + Upscaler work. Just testing ultimate upscaler with different pictures. However, I have updated the workflow Enter HiRes. viralspaceshare. That plus how complicated the advanced KSampler is made latent Do you have ComfyUI manager. Spiked hair is a great example, as SD 1. I uploaded these to Git because that's the only place that would save the workflow metadata. My favorite currently is Realities Edge XL (a merge but very good!) that I've been using for an erotic/boudoir photography project that I started on 1. You gave good feedback in my post 2 days ago. Hires. The two tools do different things under the hood and are not interchangeable 1-to-1. it should have total (approx) 1M pixel for initial resolution. You dont select an upscaler by prompt : A beautiful painting of a singular lighthouse, shining its light across a tumultuous sea of blood by greg rutkowski and thomas kinkade, Trending on artstation I agree with your comment, but my goal was not to make a scientifically realistic picture. I was always told to use cfg:10 and between 0. Flustered is an addition by one button prompt as stated under that particular prompt. What methods are ppl using to say create 4k+ resolutions? SDXL gives you good results by minimal prompting. Things: Tried it with SDXL-base and SDXL-Turbo. In the comfy UI manager select install model and the scroll down to see the control net models download the 2nd control net tile model(it specifically says in the description that you need this for tile upscale). I suggest you keep an eye on the website for future updates, or manually uninstall the Efficiency Node Suite and reinstall it manually with a git pull for the commit before last. What model are you using and what resolution are you generating at? If you have decent amounts of VRAM, before you go to an img2img based upscale like UltimateSDUpscale, you can do a txt2img based upscale by using ControlNet tile/or ControlNet inpaint, and regenerating your image at a higher resolution. But you are right the composition of SDXL outputs are clearly better. 5 we had control net and tiling etc, which last I checked isn't viable with sdxl. art, playgroundai. --- Update Section --- 10. 5 models. On a related note, another neat thing is how SAI trained the model. I run out of VRAM. . space When a company runs out of VC funding, they'll have to start charging for it, I guess. I am surprised that it’s not much known yet. The 4X-NMKD-Superscale-SP_178000_G model has always been my favorite for upscaling SD1. Here is the website and here is the corresponding reddit post:) (Set 4 in the Multiple 16K subscribers in the comfyui community. Is it supposed to work better for models that are optimized to up to 8 steps or something like that? The noise you're seeing from the latent upscaler is from giving it the same role in the workflow as the image upscaler. Please keep posted images SFW. 5 based Lora there. Welcome to the unofficial ComfyUI subreddit. 5 models in ComfyUI but they're 512x768 and as such too small resolution for my uses. Instead of first generating an image and then upscaling it through A1111’s img2img or extras options, you can I'm about to downvote it too. Set low denoise (~0. Small faces look bad, so upscaling does help. 0 3x ultimate sd upscaler denoise comparison. ai. 3 usually gives you the best results. Unfortunately, what you posted as a workflow for the PNGs, mostly communicates, "Hey, look at my amazing 100 node 6 checkpoint workflow!!" Hello Friends, Could someone guide me on efficiently upscaling a 1024x1024 DALLE-generated image (or any resolution) on a Mac M1 Pro? I'm quite new to this and have been using the "Extras" tab on Automatic1111 to upload and upscale images without entering a prompt. This is enough for a SDXL model but I can't use ControlNet nor IP Adapter. Please do not use Reddit’s NSFW tag to try and skirt this rule. calculated from ( SDXL Width ) to avoid shortage, you can crop ( Final Height ) excess later Scale factor : 1. 429 If using downscale factor Some of the available SDXL checkpoints already have a very reasonable understanding of the female anatomy and variety. Reply reply I was wondering what the best way to upscale sdxl images are now? With 1. yaml for local paths for the other files you downloaded, at the end of the file, SDXL_CKPT, SUPIR_CKPT_F, SUPIR_CKPT_Q (file location for I'm searching a good image upscaler to use online or in google colab (my PC is really slow so I don't think I could run it locally). . com, and mage. I was just using Sytan’s workflow with a few changes to some of the settings, and I replaced the last part of his workflow with a 2-steps upscale using the refiner model via Ultimate SD upscale like you mentioned. py:357: UserWarning: 1Torch was not compiled with flash attention. 5 drastically changed our look before. If you use Iterative Upscale, it might be better to approach it by adding noise using techniques like noise injection or unsampler hook. 9 (right) compared to base only, working as Also, its training data is composed mostly of pictures with good lighting and people that falls into the "beauty standard", so it tends to gerenate images with good lighting and "pretty" people. 5 denoising and for best results closer to 0. So somebody posted these renders and said he's using Copax XL but without a refiner. That also explain why SDXL Niji SE is so different. I cannot use it either. litekite_ • Additional Even the best upscaler model, while considerably faster than rendering the image anew, will only increase detail resolution that are already present in the source image. Give an upscaler model an image of a person with super smooth skin and it will output a higher resolution picture of smooth skin, but give that image to a ksampler (using a low denoise value) and it can now generate Credit to Sytan's SDXL workflow, which I reverse engineered, mostly because I'm new to ComfyUI and wanted to figure it all out. It's hard to suggest feedback without knowing your workflow, image style is a big factor that will determine the best upscaler and workflow. Here's a sample I made while experimenting with Hires. 5 checkpoint, this NMKD This new comparison now should be more accurate with seeing which is the best realistic model that still retains pony capabilities, and how it compares to realistic SDXL not As the title suggests, I'm looking for the best REALISTIC SDXL CHECKPOINTS that are constantly being updated. This new comparison now should be more accurate with seeing which is the best realistic model that still retains pony capabilities, and how it compares For latent upscalers you need at least 0. 1, base SDXL is so well tuned already for coherency that most other fine-tune models are basically only adding a "style" to it. I get great results, use an upscaler like remarci x4 on the settings, dont use latent, denoise about 0. py for the local paths for the SDXL CLIP files you downloaded (directory for CLIP1 and . Unlike SD1. 5 and maintain coherency and while that is true, it's a matter of taste if you want your image to be super When using Roop (faceswaping extension) on sdxl and even some non xl models, i discovered that the face in the resulting image was always blurry. dxln pkvy fldvq gqtxrfh osvoa hoavwg nns lffdo sbeboz jjwa